Home Blogs Suhail Maqsood

Why every project centric organization must have a comprehensive and integrated Risk Management solution

April 17th, 2009

The heightened interest in Project management over the last 50 or so years is the result of a number of coincident secular trends. Globalization of trade and production has increased financial and direct investment in volatile emerging markets. In addition, in both developed and emerging economies, capital markets have become more important as a means of allocating resources. Projects have therefore become much more complex with cross cultural teams now dispersed across regions and no longer located within the same room.

Statistics from the Project Management Institute highlight the increasing trend in Project work. In the first 17 years of PMP certifications through 2000, approximately 25,000 PMP certifications were awarded. In the five years since then more than 100,000 were awarded; 25,000 in just the first 5 months of 2005. Furthermore, value-creating activities for the organization such as mergers and acquisitions, off shoring, expansion into new territories, strategic alliances etc can all increase the complexity of Project work.

Increasing the complexity of work being planned and executed by global project teams naturally increases uncertainty. All projects face some degree of uncertainty, and the challenge for management is to determine how much uncertainty to accept as it strives to grow stakeholder value. Uncertainty presents both risk and opportunity, with the potential to erode or enhance value. A risk therefore has a probability of occurring with a positive or negative effect on the project. Enterprise risk management enables management to effectively deal with uncertainty and associated risk and opportunity, enhancing the capacity to build value.

Read the rest of this entry »

Changing the negative Project Risk Management perception…

March 23rd, 2009

It amazes me how often I see comments on the web that illustrates the lack of understanding or importance of managing Project risks. The majority of posts I’ve read suggest that looking at risks is an after thought and little benefit is realized by the project team. I’d be lying if I stated that I had never experienced this, on the contrary the majority of Projects I had worked on up until 2000 were expected to run in this way. Raising Risks would require management response, ownership or accountability and were encouraged to be discussed but no action plans produced.

It was not until the dot com bubble burst and outsourcing became the norm that we had to collaborate with project teams of different cultures and located cross multiple timezones. The challenge has always been incorporating risks into the project and continuously identifying additional threats AND opportunities as the project progresses. Project teams should be encouraged to be part of the process and not just a management chore. But, how do we actually encourage that within a rigid corporate culture? We could instill that within the Project or Program Management Office, who are probably already aware or are used to produce their own spreadsheets or custom tools to track project risks. My take is that this top down approach will only work if teams and stakeholders actually found value and saw benefit. For example, what if the application identified potential risks with little or no involvement from the team? Some tools already do this, but it seems we all have to be Risk Managers or Analysts and mathematicians at heart, great if you like maths! but if we are to successfully manage global project risks it will take much more than just spreadsheets, Project Teams will need to change and embrace new risk management tools and concepts. I’ll leave that thought with you until my next posting ;)

Risky Business

March 17th, 2009

I’ve spent the last few months evaluating how companies manage project risks and the tools that they use (if any) to communicate risk exposure and plans on how to handle that. One of the biggest obstacles seem to be a corporations failure to ensure that project teams identify risks early on and continuously re-evaluate that during the entire project lifecycle. Its a bit like the left hand is not in synch with what the right hand is doing with different groups not communicating and no clear PMO practices in place. An experienced or well trained Project Manager knows how important it is to identify, manage and control risks, but what about those that are not certified or new to the role?

As projects and teams become more complex and global in nature the need for centralized, collaborative risk management tools is even more critical. Those that do not embrace this change will be left behind to those that companies that welcome and thrive on change. Now where’s my coffee?